The figure does not have enough information to state that the two triangles are similar. Explain why you can not prove the triangles similar? What additional information would be needed? (worth 20 points)

We can't prove it equal because the measures are different, it cannot be proved through AAS, ASA, SAS or SSS

angle U=Angle R

but UW≠ RT &RS

Step-by-step explanation:

120 seems like the most sensible answer.

step-by-step explanation:

if there is only one topping on all caramel apples and there's 120 of them. then all apples should/will be covered in sprinkles. make sense?

see attached

step-by-step explanation:

given the function as;

write the equation replacing f(x) with y

form   and fill a table containing values of y with corresponding values of x

you can take a range for   values of x as -3≤x≤3

solving for x=-3

for x=-2

repeat the same procedure to get the values of y for the remaining ,x=-1 to x=3

plot the values of y against values   of x and obtain the following graph