The volume of a gas was measured as its temperature was increased from 10°K
to 15°K at intervals of 1°K. The volumes
were 1.5, 2.2, 3.38, 5.1, and 7.6 cm.
Would a linear or exponential function
better approximate the data described?
Explain why.

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

2pointswhich of the following appear in the diagram below? check all that apply. d a. zcdeов. сеo c. aéo d. zdce

What is the point of inflection for the function f(x)=2cos4x on the interval (0, pi/2)