Psl hurry will give brainliest

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Abaker makes 186 cookies. some are chocolate chip and some are oatmeal raisin, and both kinds are made with and without nuts, as shown in the table above. because they are more popular, the baker made 2/3 of the cookies chocolate chip. if a chocolate chip cookie is chosen at random, what is the probability that it will have nuts? a) 21/93 b) 21/62 c) 41/93 d) 21/41

Which is a true statement about an exterior angle of a triangle a. it is formed by two segments that are not sides of the triangle, b. it forms a linear pair with one of the interior angles of the triangle, c. it is complementary to one of the interior angles of the triangle. d. it is formed by two segments that are sides of the triangle.