Eli claims that the product of 6 Superscript 5 and 5 Superscript negative 3 is 6 squared. Which explains whether Eli is correct? Eli is correct. He added 5 + (negative 3) to find the exponent of 2.
Eli is incorrect. He added the exponents instead of subtracting them.
Eli is incorrect. He subtracted the exponents instead of adding them.
Eli is incorrect. He added the exponents even though the bases are not the same.

Given: lines a and b are parallel and line c is a transversal. prove: 2 is supplementary to 8 what is the missing reason in the proof? statement reason 1. a || b, is a transv 1. given 2. ∠6 ≅ ∠2 2. ? 3. m∠6 = m∠2 3. def. of congruent 4. ∠6 is supp. to ∠8 4. def. of linear pair 5. ∠2 is supp. to ∠8 5. congruent supplements theorem corresponding angles theorem alternate interior angles theorem vertical angles theorem alternate exterior angles theorem

Ingredient c: 1/4 cup for 2/3 serving or ingredient d: 1/3 cup for 3/4 serving which unit rate is smaller

Select all of the following expressions that are equal to 2.5.