Researchers are testing a treatment for tumors. They've found that tumors are shrinking in patients receiving the new treatment. Their calculations
suggest that if chance were the only factor, there's a 9% chance they'd get
the same results. At a .01 significance level, do the researchers have proof
the new treatment is working?
A. No. They may have one piece of evidence, but they don't have
proof.
B. Can't be determined.
C. Yes. The significance level is low enough to be proof.
D. No. The P-value isn't low enough.
E. Yes. The Pvalue is lower than the significance level.

Which option identifies how kevin should proceed in the following scenario? four years ago kevin designed an mp3 player for young children. now that technology has changed, he would like to update his design to ensure that it encompasses cutting-edge techniques. by creating a third-angle projection of his ideas by designing an isometric projection of his new ideas by referring to past designs and illustrations of his original model by conferring with engineers who have improved upon similar devices

Plz : denver is about 5,200 feet above sea level. which number line best represents this integer?

Nina has prepared the following two-column proof below. she is given that ∠oln ≅ ∠lno and she is trying to prove that ol ≅ on. triangle oln, where angle oln is congruent to angle lno step statement reason 1 ∠oln ≅ ∠lno given 2 draw oe as a perpendicular bisector to ln by construction 3 ∠leo ≅ ∠neo transitive property of equality 4 m∠leo = 90° definition of a perpendicular bisector 5 m∠neo = 90° definition of a perpendicular bisector 6 le ≅ en definition of a perpendicular bisector 7 δole ≅ δone side-angle-side (sas) postulate 8 ol ≅ on cpctc nina made two errors in the proof. identify and correct the errors.