subject
Mathematics, 12.01.2021 03:40 natalie2sheffield

Does power corrupt decision making? “Absolutely” according to an article in The Economist (January 23–29, 2010). In an experiment described by the article, a group of 15 volunteers were primed to feel
powerful and then asked to roll two 10-sided dice (each having sides 0-9) and combine the results to form
a number between 01 and 100 (letting 00 = 100). After rolling the dice in a secluded area, the subjects
were asked to report the number they rolled. This number would determine the number of tickets they
would receive for a raffle at the end of the study. The mean of their rolls was 70, much higher than the
expected value of 50.5. Does this provide convincing evidence that the subjects were lying or is it
plausible that they obtained a mean this high just by random chance?
(a) Design and carry out a simulation to estimate the probability that the mean value for 15 honest
subjects would be at least 70, assuming that the subjects were told to roll the dice one at a time and use
the first roll for the tens digit and the second roll for the ones digit.
(b) Suppose that the subjects were not told which die to use for the tens digit and which die to use for the
ones digit. Design and carry out a simulation to estimate the probability that the mean value for 15 honest
subjects would be at least 70, assuming that the larger die roll would be used for the tens dig

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Mathematics

image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 20:00, aheadrick5163
Apatient is to be given 35 milligrams of demerol every 4 hours. you have demerol 50 milligrams/milliliter in stock. how many milliliters should be given per dose?
Answers: 2
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 21:00, ally7366
Roger could feed 5 walruses with 4 kilograms of fish. how many walruses could he feed with 7.2 kilograms of fish?
Answers: 1
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 23:00, kj44
Each of the following data sets has a mean of x = 10. (i) 8 9 10 11 12 (ii) 7 9 10 11 13 (iii) 7 8 10 12 13 (a) without doing any computations, order the data sets according to increasing value of standard deviations. (i), (iii), (ii) (ii), (i), (iii) (iii), (i), (ii) (iii), (ii), (i) (i), (ii), (iii) (ii), (iii), (i) (b) why do you expect the difference in standard deviations between data sets (i) and (ii) to be greater than the difference in standard deviations between data sets (ii) and (iii)? hint: consider how much the data in the respective sets differ from the mean. the data change between data sets (i) and (ii) increased the squared difference îł(x - x)2 by more than data sets (ii) and (iii). the data change between data sets (ii) and (iii) increased the squared difference îł(x - x)2 by more than data sets (i) and (ii). the data change between data sets (i) and (ii) decreased the squared difference îł(x - x)2 by more than data sets (ii) and (iii). none of the above
Answers: 2
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 23:30, larey
Find each value of the five-number summary for this set of data. [note: type your answers as numbers. do not round.] 150, 120, 136, 180, 158, 175, 124, 162 minimum maximum median upper quartile lower quartile
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Does power corrupt decision making? “Absolutely” according to an article in The Economist (January...

Questions in other subjects: