20 points Which of the following is a counterexample for the hypothesis "All parallelograms are rectangles"?

The answer would be B

Step-by-step explanation:

A non-square rhombus. A non-square rhombus (also known as a rhombus) is different from a square with respect to its internal angles. Unlike a square, a non-square rhombus does not have all its internal angles equal to 90°. The number of lines of symmetry in a non-square rhombus is 2, whereas, a square has 4 lines of symmetry.

yeet

step-by-step explanation:

g = (2, 2)

step-by-step explanation:

given the ratio is 1 : 1 then f is the midpoint of eg

let the coordinates of g = (x, y)

using the midpoint formula

(0 + x) = 1 ( multiply both sides by 2 )

0 + x = 2 ⇒ x = 2

similarly

(4 + y) = 3 ( multiply both sides by 2 )

4 + y = 6 ( subtract 4 from both sides )

y = 2

coordinates of g = (2, 2)