Select all that apply

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

The diameter of a ball is 8 in. what is the volume of the ball? use 3.14 for pi. enter your answer as a decimal in the box. round only your final answer to the nearest hundredth.

Come up with a new linear function that has a slope that falls in the range 10 m − < < . choose two different initial values. for this new linear function, what happens to the function’s values after many iterations? are the function’s values getting close to a particular number in each case?