Part A: Explain why the x-coordinates of the points where the graphs of the equations y = 4x and y = 2x−1 intersect are the solutions of the equation 4x = 2x−1. (4 points) Part B: Make tables to find the solution to 4x = 2x−1. Take the integer values of x between −4 and 4. (4 points)

Part C: How can you solve the equation 4x = 2x−1 graphically? (2 points)

Part A: They intersect because they cross at the same point when graphed.

Part B:  

{,-4 -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4}

4x = {.0039, .015, .0625, ..25, 1, 4, 16, 64, 256}

2x−1 = {.031, .625, .125, .25, .5, 1, 2, 4, 8}

Part C:  4x = 2x−1  You would have to plug in each number until x equals the same number for both sides of the equation.. In this equation it would be x=-1.

Step-by-step explanation:

Plzz mark brainiest?

i think it's eleven too, don't woosh me here, but according to the "experts" it's 2.

the proof starts from the peano postulates, which define the natural

numbers n. n is the smallest set satisfying these postulates:

  p1.   1 is in n.

  p2.   if x is in n, then its "successor" x' is in n.

  p3.   there is no x such that x' = 1.

  p4.   if x isn't 1, then there is a y in n such that y' = x.

  p5.   if s is a subset of n, 1 is in s, and the implication

      (x in s => x' in s) holds, then s = n.

then you have to define addition recursively:

  def: let a and b be in n. if b = 1, then define a + b = a'

      (using p1 and p2). if b isn't 1, then let c' = b, with c in n

      (using p4), and define a + b = (a + c)'.

then you have to define 2:

  def:   2 = 1'

2 is in n by p1, p2, and the definition of 2.

theorem:   1 + 1 = 2

proof: use the first part of the definition of + with a = b = 1.

      then 1 + 1 = 1' = 2   q.e.d.

note: there is an alternate formulation of the peano postulates which

replaces 1 with 0 in p1, p3, p4, and p5. then you have to change the

definition of addition to this:

  def: let a and b be in n. if b = 0, then define a + b = a.

      if b isn't 0, then let c' = b, with c in n, and define

      a + b = (a + c)'.

you also have to define 1 = 0', and 2 = 1'. then the proof of the

theorem above is a little different:

proof: use the second part of the definition of + first:

      1 + 1 = (1 + 0)'

      now use the first part of the definition of + on the sum in

      parentheses:   1 + 1 = (1)' = 1' = 2   q.e.d.