I do not know how to do number 2

you would use (d.) the law of cosines or a^2 = b^2 + c^2 – 2bc(cos a)

, b^2 = a^2 + c^2 – 2ac(cos b), or c^2 = a^2 + b^2 - 2ab(cos c). you wouldn't use b. the law of sines as it is mostly effective when 1side and 2angles are given. a and c aren't the answer for they are the improper versions of the law of cosines. hope this is .

r(0,90)(x,y) . t(-5,0)

last option

step-by-step explanation:

∆def to ∆d"e"f"

- rotate 90 counterclockwise degrees

- then translated 5 to the left (x --> x - 5)

answer is the last option

a framing bias

step-by-step explanation:

rodrigo is subject to a framing bias i believe.

< xcy ≅ < xby

step-by-step explanation:

in δcax and δbax,

so, δcax ≅ δbax (side-angle-side or sas)

since δcax ≅ δbax, we can conclude < acx ≅ < abx

in δacy and δaby,

so, δacy ≅ δaby (side-angle-side or sas)

since δacy ≅ δaby, we can conclude < acy ≅ < aby

now,

< acy ≅ < aby

=> < acx + < xcy ≅ < abx + < xby

=> < acx + < xcy ≅ < acx + < xby   (since < acx ≅ < abx already proved above)

subtracting < acx from both sides, we get

< acx + < xcy -< acx ≅ < acx + < xby -< acx

cancelling out < acx and -< acx from both sides, we get

< xcy ≅ < xby (proved)