subject
Mathematics, 03.12.2020 19:00 amedaldafari

Rachel is trying to find the length of the lake shown on the diagram. She knows that if the two triangles are similar, she can use a proportion to solve for the length. How can Rachel justify that the triangles are similar? What is the length of the lake? A) Corresponding sides of the two triangles have the ratio of 4:1, which proves SAS similarity. The length of the lake is 212 m. B) Corresponding sides of the two triangles have the ratio of 4:1, which proves SSS similarity. The length of the lake is 132 m. C) Corresponding sides of the two triangles have the ratio of 3:1, which proves SSS similarity. The length of the lake is 159 m. D) Corresponding sides of the two triangles have the ratio of 4:1, which proves AAS similarity. The length of the lake is 240 m.

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Mathematics

image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 16:30, leenzazou98241
The average human heart beats 1.15 \cdot 10^51.15⋅10 5 1, point, 15, dot, 10, start superscript, 5, end superscript times per day. there are 3.65 \cdot 10^23.65⋅10 2 3, point, 65, dot, 10, start superscript, 2, end superscript days in one year. how many times does the heart beat in one year? write your answer in scientific notation, and round to one decimal place.
Answers: 1
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 16:30, catdog2230
Determine whether the quadrilateral below is a parallelogram. justify/explain your answer (this means back it up! give specific information that supports your decision. writing just "yes" or "no" will result in no credit.)
Answers: 2
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 17:00, Will1119
How many credit hours will a student have to take for the two tuition costs to be equal? round the answer to the nearest tenth of an hour.
Answers: 1
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:40, rivera8
Juliana says that she can use the patterns of equivalent ratios in the multiplication table below to write an infinite number of ratios that are equivalent to 6: 10. which statement explains whether juliana is correct? she is correct because she can multiply 6 and 10 by any number to form an equivalent ratio. she is correct because 6: 10 can be written as 1: 2 and there are an infinite number of ratios for 1: 2. she is not correct because the multiplication table does not include multiples of 10. she is not correct because 6: 10 is equivalent to 3: 5 and there are only 9 ratios in the multiplication table that are equivalent to 3: 5.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Rachel is trying to find the length of the lake shown on the diagram. She knows that if the two tria...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
English, 18.03.2021 01:10
Konu
Mathematics, 18.03.2021 01:10