Which would be the most appropriate way to estimate -6.1(0.22)? Check all that apply. A. Use rounding to get -6(0.2), and then multiply.
B. Use compatible numbers, such as -6(0.5), and then multiply.
C. Use the benchmark numbers -6 and 1, and then multiply.
D. Use front-end estimation to get -6(0.2), and then multiply.
E. Round the factors to the nearest whole number, and then multiply.

A) Use rounding to get -6(0.2), and then multiply.  B) Use compatible numbers, such as -6(0.5), and then multiply.  D) Use front-end estimation to get -6(0.2), and then multiply

Step-by-step explanation:

stew reads at the fastest rate of 265 words per minute.

step-by-step explanation:

it's a given that felicia reads at 260 word per minute and on connie's graph we can see that she reads 200 words per minute. since stew's table tells us that he read 795 in 3 minutes, we can divide 795 by 3 to find out how many words he reads per minute.

795/3 = 265

stew reads 265 words per minute - he reads at the fastest rate since felecia reads at 260 words per minute and connie reads at 200 words per minute.

stew (265) > felecia (260) > connie (200)

check above link.

graphically?   well, you graph them both, the solutions is where they both intersect each other, since there are two solutions, meaning they will meet twice, or namely the linear will run into the quadratic curve twice, and where they meet, those x,y coordinates are the solutions to the system.