Compare the two graphs and explain the transformation that was applied to f(x) in order to look exactly like the graph of g(x). How did the transformation affect the domain and range of the function? You can use tables, graphs, or equations to justify your answer.

The two graphs are represented below.

Answer and Step-by-step explanation: One graph can "transform" into another through changes in the function.

There are 3 ways to change a function:

Now, the points for f(x) are:

(-5,0)  (0,6)  (5,-4)  (8,0)

And the points for g(x) are:

(-5,-3)  (0,-9)   (5,1)   (8,-3)

Comparing points:

(-5,0) → (-5,-3)

(0,6) → (0,-9)

(5,-4) → (5,1)

(8,0) → (8,-3)

It can be noted that x-coordinate is kept the same; only y-coordinate is changing so we have a vertical change. Observing the points:

(-5,0-3) → (-5,-3)

(0,6-15) → (0,-9)

(5,-4+5) → (5,1)

(8,0-3) → (8,-3)

Then, the vertical change is a Vertical Shift.

Another observation is that y-coordinate of f(x) is the opposite of g(x). for example: At the second point, y-coordinate of f(x) is 6, while of g(x) is -9. So, this transformation is also a Reflection.

Range of a function is all the values y can assume after substituting the x-values.

Domain of a function is all the values x can assume.

Reflection doesn't change range nor domain of a function. However, vertical or horizontal translations do.

Any vertical translation will change the range of a function and keep domain intact.

Then, for f(x) and g(x):

graph            translation            domain      range

f(x)                       none                 [-5,8]          [-4,6]

g(x)                vertical shift           [-5,8]          [-9,1]

In conclusion, this transformation (or translation) will affect the range of g(x)

answer: this doesnt make any sense especially the photo.

step-by-step explanation:

step-by-step explanation: