Please help I have a D in this class.

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

The cone in the diagram has the same height and base area as the prism. what is the ratio of the volume of the cone to the volume of the prism? h hl base area-b base area =b volume of cone_1 volume of prism 2 volume of cone 1 volume of prism 3 volume of cone 2 volume of prism 3 oc. od. volume of cone volume of prism e. volume of cone volume of prism 3 2

Scores on the cognitive scale of the bayley-scales of infant and toddler development range from 1 to 19, with a standard deviation of 3. calculate the margin of error in estimating the true mean cognitive scale score, with 99% confidence, if there are 12 infants and toddlers in a sample.