Please I need your help guys anybody

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Need match the functions with correct transformation. f(x) = -3x f(x) = |x-1|+3 f(x) = √(x+3) 1/2x² f(x) = (x+1)²-3 4|x| 1. compress by a factor of 1/2 2. stretch by a factor of 4 3. shift to the left 3 4. shift to the left 1 5. shift up 3 6. reflection

Suppose 38 lbs of coffee beans are required to produce 2 lbs of farmer's coffee. how many lbs of coffee beans are required to produce 309 lbs of farmer's coffee?