The graph shows Felix's English scores versus the number of hours he studies: A graph titled Felixs English Scores shows Hours of Practice in a Week on x axis and English Scores on y axis. The x axis scale is shown from 0 to 5 at increments of 1 and the y axis scale is shown from 0 to 50 at increments of 5.The ordered pairs 0, 15 and 0.5, 20 and 1, 21 and 1.5, 25 and 2, 30 and 2.5, 32 and 3, 38 and 3.5, 42 and 4, 43 and 4.5, 45 and 5, 46 are shown on the graph. A straight line joins the ordered pairs 0, 15 and 5, 50.
What will Felix's English scores most likely be if he spends 7 hours a week studying English? (1 point)

64 points
72 points
84 points
92 points

true

explanation:

-3 degrees

step-by-step explanation:

third choice down

step-by-step explanation:

the first inequality is based on the number of adults and campers, and the second inequality is based on the cost of feeding both the adult and the camper.

we know that there is room for 525 people max.   it's ok to have less than 525, but it's not ok to have more than 525, so the inequality is less than or equal to.   the number combination of adults (x) and campers (y) cannot exceed this 525 max.   therefore:

x + y ≤ 525

now we talk about cost.   it costs $9 to feed one adult, so depending upon the number of adults you have (x) depends upon how much it will cost to feed that number of adults.   same with the campers, who cost $5 to feed.   the adults can be represented by 9x and the campers can be represented by 5y.   since the budget cannot exceed 1,200, the second inequality is:

9x + 5y ≤ 1200