Mathematics, 26.10.2020 05:00 gizmo50245
LaVonne estimated 38% of 63 by rounding 38% up to 40%, rounding 63 up to 70, and then multiplying 70 by 0.4 to get 28. Is her estimate reasonable?
No, because she should have rounded 38% down to 30%.
No, because she should have rounded 63 down to 60.
Yes, because she correctly rounded 38% up to 40%.
Yes, because she correctly rounded 63 up to 70.
Answers: 2
Other questions on the subject: Mathematics
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 16:00, alannismichelle9
In the diagram, the ratio of ab to ae is (1/2) . what is the ratio of the length of to the length of ?
Answers: 3
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 16:30, skylarjohnson2683
What is true about the dilation? it is a reduction with a scale factor between 0 and 1. it is a reduction with a scale factor greater than 1. it is an enlargement with a scale factor between 0 and 1. it is an enlargement with a scale factor greater than 1.
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:50, anthonylemus36
Jermaine has t subway tokens. karen has 4 more subway tokens than jermaine. raul has 5 fewer subway tokens than jermaine. which expression represents the ratio of karen's tokens to raul's tokens
Answers: 1
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 20:40, Nyasiahenry
The roots of the function f(x) = x2 – 2x – 3 are shown. what is the missing number?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
LaVonne estimated 38% of 63 by rounding 38% up to 40%, rounding 63 up to 70, and then multiplying 70...
Questions in other subjects:
Mathematics, 16.04.2020 18:06
History, 16.04.2020 18:06
