Is x = –4 a valid solution this linear equation? 2x + 9(x – 1) = 8(2x + 2) – 5

No. When –4 is substituted for the variable, the result is a true statement.
No. When –4 is substituted for the variable, the result is a false statement.
Yes. When –4 is substituted for the variable, the result is a true statement.
Yes. When –4 is substituted for the variable, the result is a false statement.

statement #3: proof- ang is congruent to ang ecd : angles are congruent.  

step-by-step explanation:

1: the missing angles in statement #3  

a.) acb  

reason- the reason why the answer is acb is because angle ecd and angle acb are both the same size *that's what the word congruent means this is really simple.  

2: the missing word in reason #3  

c.) vertical  

reason- the reason why the answer is vertical is because the angles in that diagram on figure 2 is slanted, which is vertical, and the e and a both lay on vertical lines. along with the other's, but e and a are the 2 main points you want to focus on. and c is kind of like your starting point, because c is for both angles, not just one.  

i hope that was and understanding.

is there more info provided? there is not enough information given in the problem

a = π r² (\frac{x}{360} )

360a =   π r² x

\frac{360a}{\pi r^{2}}   = x

step-by-step explanation: