A. In Problem 3, the equation of the line of best fit y = 409.43x – 815,446.71 gave the cost y of attending a four-yeal public college in academic year x. You used
x = 2000 to represent academic year 2000-2001. Estimate the cost of attending
a four-year public college in the 2016-2017 academic year.

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Use the formulas a = x 2 – y 2, b = 2xy, c = x 2 + y 2 to answer this question. one leg of a right triangle has length 11 and all sides are whole numbers. find the lengths of the other two sides. the other leg = a0 and the hypotenuse = a1

List x1, x2, x3, x4 where xi is the left endpoint of the four equal intervals used to estimate the area under the curve of f(x) between x = 4 and x = 6. a 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5 b 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6 c 4.25, 4.75, 5.25, 5.75 d 4, 4.2, 5.4, 6