HELP WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Marcus and cody both leave the park at the same time, but in opposite directions. if cody travels 6 mph faster than marcus and after 4 hours they are 64 miles apart, how fast is each traveling? solve using rare times time = distance.

Select the conic section that represents the equation. 3x2 + 3y2 -2x + 4 = 0