in 1 hour, 18.5 pounds of cookies can be baked. At that rate, how many pounds can be baked in 7,5 hours?

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Fine the area of the kite. a. 90 sq. units b. 9 sq. units c. 180 sq. units d. 45 sq. units

One expression below in undefined, and the other expression has a well defined value. which expression is undefined and explain why it has no value. which expression is defined? what is the value of that expression and how do you know? what is a different expression using a trig inverse function that is also undefined?