subject
Mathematics, 30.09.2020 05:01 lame3245

Janet is designing a frame for a client. She wants to prove to her client that m∠AGE ≅ m∠CHE in her sketch. What is the missing justification in the proof?

ansver
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: Mathematics

image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 22:00, zurfluhe
Manuela claims that and are congruent. which statement best describes her claim? she is incorrect because the segments do not have the same orientation. she is incorrect because the segments do not have the same length. she is correct because the segments have the same length. she is correct because the segments have the same orientation.
Answers: 1
image
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 00:00, jonmorton159
Need plz been trying to do it for a long time and still haven’t succeeded
Answers: 1
image
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 02:00, randall10
Jared had 3/7 of the minutes on a family phone plan remaining for the month. the plan is shared by 2 people. if divided equally what portion of the minutes remaining on the phone plan would be avalible for each person
Answers: 1
image
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 02:30, bcampos
Find the product. type your answer in the space provided. use / for a fraction bar (example: 1/2) and ^ for an exponent (example: x^5). do not put spaces in your answer. (x -1 y 5)^2 · (2xy -2)^5
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Janet is designing a frame for a client. She wants to prove to her client that m∠AGE ≅ m∠CHE in her...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 24.05.2021 17:30
Konu
English, 24.05.2021 17:30
Konu
History, 24.05.2021 17:30
Konu
Mathematics, 24.05.2021 17:30