Classify the following triangle. Check all that apply.

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

The length of the largest fish is 967.74 times greater than the length of the smallest fish. select a variable expression that shows the length of the largest fish, if 8 is the length of the smallest fish. a. s + 967.74 b. \[ \frac{967.74}{s} \] c. 967.74 - s d. 967. 74s

Ineed on this question me get the answer