Branden and Janna are analyzing the same conditional statement. Branden finds multiple examples that validate the conditional statement. Janna finds one example that satisfies the hypothesis of the conditional statement, but
not the conclusion. Which must be true?
A) The conditional statement is true. There are more examples that validate the statement than there are that do not
B) The conditional statement is true. There is at least one example that validates the statement.
C) The conditional statement is false. There is at least one counterexample for the statement
D) The conditional statement is false. There must be exactly one example that validates the statement

its 4 because 2 times 2 is 4, if you double the number two you get four

the graph in the attached figure

step-by-step explanation:

we have

using a graphing tool

the graph in the attached figure

the roots are ( x-intercepts) x=-0.5,x=1,x=3

the y-intercept is the point (0,3)

step-by-step explanation:

y = | -2(-2) |     →     y = | 4 |     →     y = 4       ⇒   (-2, 4)

y = | -2(-1) |     →     y = | 2 |     →       y =   2       ⇒   (-1, 2)    

y = | -2(0) |     →     y = | 0 |     →       y = 0         ⇒   (0, 0)

y = | -2(1) |   c →     y = | -2 |     →     y =   2         ⇒   (1, 2)    

y = | -2(2) |     →     y = | - 4 |     →     y =   4         ⇒   (2, 4)  

b. 153 students do not participate in sports and seventy-five 12th graders were surveyed