Mathematics, 20.08.2020 16:01 naiomireyes74p2aybs
Ramesh says that based on the pattern 7 Superscript negative 5 = negative 16,807. Which statement explains whether Ramesh is correct? Ramesh is correct because 7 Superscript negative 5 is equivalent to Negative 7 times (negative 7) times (negative 7) times (negative 7) times (negative 7), which has the same value as Negative 16,807. Ramesh is correct because as the exponents decrease, the previous value is divided by 7, so 7 Superscript negative 5 = 1 divided by 7 divided by 7 divided by 7 divided by 7 divided by 7 = negative 16,807. Ramesh is not correct because 7 Superscript negative 5 is equivalent to StartFraction 1 Over 7 Superscript 5 EndFraction, which has the same value as StartFraction 1 Over 7 Superscript 4 EndFraction divided by 7 = StartFraction 1 Over 7 cubed EndFraction = StartFraction 1 Over 343 EndFraction. Ramesh is not correct because as the exponents decrease, the previous value is divided by 7, so 7 Superscript negative 5 = 1 divided by 7 divided by 7 divided by 7 divided by 7 divided by 7 = StartFraction 1 Over 16,807 EndFraction.
Answers: 3
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 16:00, kissesforlester7097
Given right triangle xyz, which correctly describes the locations of the sides in relation to
Answers: 1
Ramesh says that based on the pattern 7 Superscript negative 5 = negative 16,807. Which statement ex...
Mathematics, 03.07.2019 19:30
Mathematics, 03.07.2019 19:30
Social Studies, 03.07.2019 19:30