The measure of AngleMKJ is 80°. After analyzing the diagram, Janelle concludes that Ray K L is an angle bisector. Point K has three lines extending from it. One line extends to point M, another to point L, and another to point J. Angle M K L is (2 x + 10) degrees. Angle L K J is (3 x minus 5) degrees. Which statement best describes Janelle's conclusion? Her conclusion is incorrect because 2x + 10 is not equal to 3x – 5. Her conclusion is incorrect because the angles are not marked; therefore, no conclusion can be drawn. Her conclusion is correct because the value of x is 15. Her conclusion is correct because mAngleLKM + mAngleLKJ = mAngleMKJ.

step-by-step explanation:

we are given

since, we have to isolate x on anyone side

so, we can move all x terms on one side

subtract both sides by 2x

add both sides by 9

divide both sides by 4

we get

false

step-by-step explanation:

rulers and compasses arent required in order to bisect an angle because when bisecting angles, you're making a "half circle" and considering in order to bisect an angle it wouldn't be straight, you wouldn't need either of the two

, and

for

step-by-step explanation:

we can analyze the pattern at which the terms increase. let us denote , , , so that we can call

note the following:

the pattern: to get the next term value, we just add the next term number (e.g. 1st, 2nd, to the previous term value (term values are the given numbers in the question, 1, 3, 6, 10, 15,

from , to get to , we add

from , to get to , we add

etc.

we need to form a recursive formula, a formula that has the next term as a function of the previous term. so a possible recursive formula can be

, and for