Drag the tiles to the correct boxes to complete the pairs. Not all tiles will be used. Match each set of features to the corresponding quadratic function.
maximum value of 5
y-intercept at (0,-1)
x-intercepts at (-1,0), (4,0)
maximum value of -1
y-intercept at (0,-2)
x-intercepts at (3,0), (1,0)
minimum value of -4
y-intercept at (0,-3)
x-intercepts at (-3,0), (1,0)
maximum value of 1
y-intercept at (0,-3)
x-intercepts at (-3,0), (-1,0)
minimum value of -5
y-intercept at (0,3)
x-intercepts at (-2,0), (-1,0)
maximum value of 4
y-intercept at (0,-5)
x-intercepts at (1,0), (5,0)
Function
Features
→
h(x) = -x2 + 6x - 5
g(x) = -x2 - 4x - 3
f(x) = x2 + 2x - 3

3/5

step-by-step explanation:

double number line is not a standard concept, so it must have been defined in your textbook. assume top line is numerator.

i think it's eleven too, don't woosh me here, but according to the "experts" it's 2.

the proof starts from the peano postulates, which define the natural

numbers n. n is the smallest set satisfying these postulates:

  p1.   1 is in n.

  p2.   if x is in n, then its "successor" x' is in n.

  p3.   there is no x such that x' = 1.

  p4.   if x isn't 1, then there is a y in n such that y' = x.

  p5.   if s is a subset of n, 1 is in s, and the implication

      (x in s => x' in s) holds, then s = n.

then you have to define addition recursively:

  def: let a and b be in n. if b = 1, then define a + b = a'

      (using p1 and p2). if b isn't 1, then let c' = b, with c in n

      (using p4), and define a + b = (a + c)'.

then you have to define 2:

  def:   2 = 1'

2 is in n by p1, p2, and the definition of 2.

theorem:   1 + 1 = 2

proof: use the first part of the definition of + with a = b = 1.

      then 1 + 1 = 1' = 2   q.e.d.

note: there is an alternate formulation of the peano postulates which

replaces 1 with 0 in p1, p3, p4, and p5. then you have to change the

definition of addition to this:

  def: let a and b be in n. if b = 0, then define a + b = a.

      if b isn't 0, then let c' = b, with c in n, and define

      a + b = (a + c)'.

you also have to define 1 = 0', and 2 = 1'. then the proof of the

theorem above is a little different:

proof: use the second part of the definition of + first:

      1 + 1 = (1 + 0)'

      now use the first part of the definition of + on the sum in

      parentheses:   1 + 1 = (1)' = 1' = 2   q.e.d.

what chart am i supposed to follow?