An increase in walking has been shown to contribute to a healthier life-style. A sedentary American takes an average of 5000 steps per day (and 65% of Americans are overweight). A group of health-conscious employees of a large health care system volunteered to wear pedometers for a month to record their steps. It was found that a random sample of 40 walkers took an average of 5430 steps per day, and the population standard deviation is 600 steps. At = 0.05 can it be concluded that they walked more than the mean number of 5000 steps per day?

Step-by-step explanation:

We would set up the hypothesis test. This is a test of a single population mean since we are dealing with mean

For the null hypothesis,

H0: µ = 5000

For the alternative hypothesis,

H1: µ > 5000

Since the population standard deviation is given, z score would be determined from the normal distribution table. The formula is

z = (x - µ)/(σ/√n)

Where

x = sample mean

µ = population mean

σ = population standard deviation

n = number of samples

From the information given,

µ = 5000

x = 5430

σ = 600

n = 40

z = (5430 - 5000)/(600/√40) = 4.53

Looking at the normal distribution table, the probability corresponding to the z score is < 0.0001

Since alpha, 0.05 > than the p value, then we would reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, at a 5% level of significance, it can be concluded that they walked more than the mean number of 5000 steps per day.

susie has 7 apples