Mathematics, 25.06.2020 04:01 fatherbamboo
An event management company purchases a new van. The value of the van, x years after the purchase, is shown in the table. here is the graph: Time (years): 0, 1, 2, 3 Value (dollars): 20000, 18000, 16200, 14580
Answers: 1
Mathematics, 20.06.2019 18:04, Uc34758
Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 16:00, ashl3yisbored
Determine the mean and variance of the random variable with the following probability mass function. f(x)=( 729divided by 91) (1 divided by 9) superscript x baseline comma x equals 1,2,3 round your answers to three decimal places (e. g. 98.765).
Answers: 3
An event management company purchases a new van. The value of the van, x years after the purchase, i...
English, 19.02.2021 18:00
Mathematics, 19.02.2021 18:00
Mathematics, 19.02.2021 18:00
Mathematics, 19.02.2021 18:00