Which statement justifies that ∠K ≅ ∠N? answers: A) ΔHKL ≅ ΔHMN by ASA; but the two angles aren't congruent because they aren't corresponding angles. B) The two angles aren't congruent. C) ΔHKL ≅ ΔHMN by ASA; ∠K ≅ ∠N because they're corresponding angles in congruent triangles. D) ΔHLK ≅ ΔHMN by AAS; ∠K ≅ ∠N because they're corresponding angles in congruent triangles.

Correct answer is:

D) ΔHLK ≅ ΔHMN by AAS; ∠K ≅ ∠N because they're corresponding angles in congruent triangles.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given the diagram, in which there are 2 triangles namely .

1. Side KH = Side NH

2.

From the given figure, we can derive that:

Property used: Vertically opposite angels made by two lines crossing each other are equal.

So, we have two angles ( and )of the triangle as same and one side equal from the two given triangles .

So, we can say that the two triangles are congruent.

The side is not between the two equal angles, so it is AAS congruence.

And Congruent triangles have their corresponding angles equal.

Therefore, option D) is true :

ΔHLK ≅ ΔHMN by AAS; ∠K ≅ ∠N, because they're corresponding angles in congruent triangles.

c.

step-by-step explanation:

where is abdul's work? don't see that anywhere posted : /

step-by-step explanation: