Which point would map onto itself after a reflection across the line y = -x? (44)

(4,0)

(0.4)

(4, 4)

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Given the following sampling distribution of one mean with a sample size 49, from a normally distributed population, find the population standard deviation, o.79828588912497

1. if we have 3 babies what is the probability they’re going to be all boys? 2. if we roll 2 die at the same time what is the probability of getting less than 10 on the first roll and a 5 on the second roll 3. if we have 3 babies what is the probability their is going to be 2 girls? 4. if we have 3 babies what is the probability of having no more than 1 girl? 5. it we have 3 babies and then have another 3 babies what is the probability of us having at least 1 boy and then having all girls?