Some have argued that throwing darts at the stock pages to decide which companies to invest in could be a successful stock-picking strategy. Suppose a researcher decides to test this theory and randomly chooses 250 companies to invest in. After 1 year, 135 of the companies were considered winners; that is, they outperformed other companies in the same investment class. To assess whether the dart-picking strategy resulted in a majority of winners, the researcher tested Upper H 0: pequals0.5 versus Upper H 1: pgreater than0.5 and obtained a P-value of 0.1030. Explain what this P-value means and write a conclusion for the researcher.

The calculated value Z = 1.2903 < 1.96 at 0.05 level of significance

Null hypothesis is accepted at 0.05 level of significance

The population proportion is equal to 0.5

Step-by-step explanation:

Step (i):-

Given random sample size ' n' = 250

Sample proportion 'p'

Given Population proportion  P = 0.5

                                       Q = 1-P = 1-0.5 =0.5

Null Hypothesis : H₀ : P = 0.5

Alternative Hypothesis : H₁ : P≥ 0.5

Step(ii):-

Test statistic

            Z  = 1.2903

Level of significance α = 0.05

Z₀.₀₅ = 1.96

The calculated value Z = 1.2903 < 1.96 at 0.05 level of significance

Null hypothesis is accepted at 0.05 level of significance

Step(iii):-

P- value

The probability of test statistic

P(Z > 1.2903) = 0.5 - A ( 1.2903)

                      = 0.5 - 0.4015

                      = 0.0985≅ 0.10

i) P- value =0.10 >  α = 0.05

null hypothesis is accepted

Conclusion:-

The population proportion is equal to 0.5

1. 3. can also be expressed as (22/7)

2. -4.5

3. 3.6

happy to

pls mark as brainliest