A state patrol officer saw a car start from rest at a highway​ on-ramp. She radioed ahead to another officer 22 mi along the highway. When the car reached the location of the second officer 21 min​ later, it was clocked going 60​ mi/hr. The driver of the car was given a ticket for exceeding the 60​ mi/hr speed limit. Why can the officer conclude that the driver exceeded the speed​ limit?a. the officer can conclude the drive exceeded the speed limit becuase by the extreme value theorem, at some time c, the car was travelling at a speed of miles per hour. b. the officer can conclude the drive exceeded the speed limit because, by Rolle's theorem, at some time c, the car was travelling at a speed of miles per hour. c. the officer can conclude the driver exceeded the speed limit because by the mean value theorem, at some time c, the car was travelling at a speed of miles per hour.

idk

step-by-step explanation:

step-by-step explanation:

step 1: solve one of the equations for one of the variables. let's solve the first equation for y:

step 2: substitute that equation into the other equation, and solve for x.

step 3: substitute x = 4 x = 4 x=4 into one of the original equations, and solve for y.

the number of possible outcomes that do not show a 1 on the first spinner and show the number 4 on the second spinner is 2.

spinner 1 spinner 2

1                     1

1                     2

1                     3

1                     4

2                   1

2                   2

2                   3

2                   4   = not 1, and 4

3                   1

3                   2

3                   3

3                   4 = not 1, and 4

only 2 outcomes have passed the given condition.

step-by-step explanation:

maya’s expression will generate the wrong sum because she violated the commutative property.

step-by-step explanation: