Which of the following reasons can be used to justify statement #4 in the proof? A SAS
B the transitive property
C the reflexive property
D CPCTC

D.

Step-by-step explanation:

CPCTC which stands for "corresponding parts of congruent triangles are congruent". Since ΔMQN and ΔPQN have already been proved congruent, So every angle and sides of these two triangle corresponding with each other would be congruent.

c - they will have the same distribution

step-by-step explanation:

this is the only one that could make sense. : )

for this case we must apply distributive property to the following expression:

the distributive property states that:

then, when applying the property we have to multiply the -2 for each term within the parenthesis: