Solve the inequality 3(x – 2) + 1 ≥ x + 2(x + 2).

By solving the given inequality "", we get "".

The given inequality is:

By solving the brackets, we get

→  

→        

By subtracting "3x" from both sides, we get

→

→              

Thus the above answer is right.

Learn more:

link

no solution

Step-by-step explanation:

3(x – 2) + 1 ≥ x + 2(x + 2).

Distribute

3x – 6 + 1 ≥ x + 2x + 4

Combine like terms

3x -5 ≥ 3x +4

Subtract 3x from each side

-5 ≥ 4

This is never true so there is no solution

the smallest possible measurement of the width is 14 feet

step-by-step explanation:

let's assume length of parallelogram is 'l'

width of parallelogram is 'w'

the perimeter of a parallelogram must be no less than 40 feet

so, we get

we are given

length of parallelogram is 6 feet

so,

l=6

we can plug it

now, we can solve for w

subtract both sides by 12

divide both sides by 2

and we get

so,

the smallest possible measurement of the width is 14 feet

yes

step-by-step explanation:

yes