Quarters are currently minted with weights normally distributed and having a standard deviation of 0.065. New equipment is being tested in an attempt to improve quality by reducing variation. A simple random sample of 25 quarters is obtained from those manufactured with the new equipment, and this sample has a standard deviation of 0.047 . Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that quarters manufactured with the new equipment have weights with a standard deviation less than 0.065. Does the new equipment appear to be effective in reducing the variation of weights?

Yes, the new equipment appear to be effective in reducing the variation of weights.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that Quarters are currently minted with weights normally distributed and having a standard deviation of 0.065.

A simple random sample of 25 quarters is obtained from those manufactured with the new equipment, and this sample has a standard deviation of 0.047.

Let = standard deviation of weights of new equipment.

SO, Null Hypothesis, : 0.065      {means that the new equipment have weights with a standard deviation more than or equal to 0.065}

Alternate Hypothesis, : < 0.065      {means that the new equipment have weights with a standard deviation less than 0.065}

The test statistics that would be used here One-sample chi-square test statistics;

                           T.S. =    ~

where, s = sample standard deviation = 0.047

           n = sample of quarters = 25

So, the test statistics  =    ~     

                                     =  12.55

The value of chi-square test statistics is 12.55.

Now, at 0.05 significance level the chi-square table gives critical value of 13.85 at 24 degree of freedom for left-tailed test.

Since our test statistic is less than the critical value of chi-square as 12.55 < 13.85, so we have sufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will fall in the rejection region due to which we reject our null hypothesis.

Therefore, we conclude that the new equipment have weights with a standard deviation less than 0.065.

square pyramid

step-by-step explanation:

square prism looks like nothing like that

triangular prism has a rectangular base instead of a square base

tetrahedron has a triangular base

homozygous. one is homozygous, while two is heterozygous.