I need help doing this math question.

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Acable company wants to provide cell phone service for residents on an island. the function for the cost of laying the cable from the island to the mainland is c(x)= 6.500 square root x2+4, where x represents the length of the cable in feet. what are the domain and range of the function? a) domain: all real numbers range: all real numbers greater than or equal to 17,000 b) domain: all real numbers greater than or equal to 0 range: all real numbers greater than or equal to 17,000 c) domain: all real numbers greater than or equal to 0 range: all real numbers greater than or equal to 13,000 d) domain: all real numbers greater than or equal to 13,000 range: all real numbers greater than or equal to 0

Problem number 26 of the rhind papyrus says: find a quantity such that when it is added to of itself the result is a 15. the modern day equation that models this problem is x + x = 15. what is the solution to the equation? x = 10 x = 12 x = 15 x = 30