Someone pl hell
Alfonso graphs the inequality x greater-than negative 8 using the steps below. Step 1: Draw a number line, and place an open circle at –8. A number line going from negative 13 to negative 3. An open circle is at negative 8. Step 2: Shade to the left of –8 to represent the infinite solutions to x greater-than negative 8. A number line going from negative 13 to negative 3. An open circle is at negative 8. Everything to the left of the circle is shaded. Step 3: Check work by substitution. x = negative 9 Negative 9 greater-than negative 8 False Which best describes the situation?

d

step-by-step explanation:

hello and welcome!

so, when we see the words "proportional" along with a table, we need to know that we're looking numbers that divide by the same thing.

looking at this table, we simply have to do a trial and error, and divide to see which numbers have the same quotient. if you look at choice a & c, they both have equal quotients for three of the numbers, with one exception, so those can't be the answer. looking at b, there is no similarity, so that can't be it. then, we see d; if you divide all the numbers in the table, you'll see that they all divide by two, which is a proportional relationship, and our answer!

also, always remember that the x will always be the number that goes into y, and somewhere behind this table, is a formula. for this specific table, the formula would be:

since our x-value is being divided by two to get the y-value. and if they were to ask for more numbers in the series, this is the formula you would use to find them.

kbmflmklbhml; bmlzb; bdhzz

step-by-step explanation:

c.

step-by-step explanation:

hello, sorry being so rude after all that fighting i found it kind of funny, so as me saying sorry here is an answer!

since the table showed her that   2km = 2000m.

to determine, how many km in 2000m, she would divide by 1000.

= 2000 / 1000 = 2 km.

similarly, for 8000m = 8000 / 1000 = 8 km

cheers to savings

~

your pal papaguy