A newspaper article reported on differences between unemployment rates of U. S. military veterans and non-veterans. Data selected randomly from local veterans and non-veterans, shows a 1% difference. Sample sizes were large enough to give a P-value of 0.015. What issue exists in concluding that the unemployment rate is significantly higher for U. S. veterans? Group of answer choices A 1% difference is not statistically significant. The samples gathered cannot be expected to represent the larger populations of U. S. veterans and non-veterans. The samples were self-selected. The groups were not chosen by random assignment.

c. 16 units

step-by-step explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!

step-by-step explanation:

i believe its "c" because all of the other options include a but it could be d because there is a way of financing with cash at certain places but its uncommon.

yes, gavin is right.

step-by-step explanation:

gavin is correct. 

this problem is about converting 9% per year to how many percent per quarter. the rate is still the same. it only differed in the time period. so, through dimensional analysis,

9% per year  × (1 year / 4 quarters) = 2.25% per quarter

if he was asked to convert 9% per year to how many percent per quarter  compounded quarterly, then you will not simply divide by four. this is because compounding is not linear.

hope this , have a good day. c;