Beth buys a flute for $400 and pays 6% sales tax. What is the total price she pays for the flute?

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Marlow is comparing the prices of two trucks rental compaines company a charges $3 per hour and an addtional $75 as serivce charges company b charges $2 per hour and an additional $85 as serivce charges

Could somebody me with this radical simplification?