subject
Mathematics, 06.05.2020 06:57 oprajapati

In a survey, 500 adults in a certain country were asked how many hours they worked in the previous week. Based on the results, a 95% confidence interval for mean number of hours worked was lower bound: 40.3 and upper bound: 41.9. Which of the following represents a reasonable interpretation of the result? For those that are not reasonable, explain the flaw. Complete parts (a) through (d) below.
(A) There is a 95% chance the mean number of hours worked by adults in this country in the previous week was between 41.5 hours and 45.6 hours.

A. Flawed. This interpretation makes an implication about individuals rather than the mean.

B. Flawed. This interpretation implies that the mean is only for last week.

C. Correct

D. Flawed. This interpretation implies that the population mean varies rather than the interval

(B) We are 95% confident that the mean number of hours worked by adults in this country in the previous week was between 41.5 hours and 45.6 hours.

A. Flawed. This interpretation does not make it clear that the 95% is the probability that the mean is within the interval.

B. Flawed. This interpretation makes an implication about individuals rather than the mean.

C. Flawed. This interpretation implies that the population mean varies rather than the interval.

D. Correct

(C) 95% of adults in this country worked between 41.5 hours and 45.6 hours last week.0D. Flawed. This interpretation does not make it clear that the 95% is the probability that the mean is within the interval.

A. Correct

B Flawed . This interpretation makes an implication about individuals rather than the mean.

C. Flawed. This interpretation implies that the mean is only for last week.

D. Flawed. This interpretation does not make it clear that the 95% is the probability that the mean is within the interval.

(D) We are 95% confident that the mean number of hours worked by adults in a particular area of this country in the previous week was between 41.5 hours and 45.6 hours.

A. Flawed; the interpretation should be about the mean number of hours worked by adults in the whole country, not about adults in the particular area.

B. Correct

C. Flawed. This interpretation implies that the population mean varies rather than the interval.

D. Flawed . This interpretation makes an implication about individuals rather than the mean.

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Mathematics

image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:00, sophiaa23
Louise measured the perimeter of her rectangular scrapbook to be 154 cm. if the scrapbook is 45 cm wide, how long is the scrapbook?
Answers: 1
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:10, twirlergirl800
If a || b and e || f , what if the value of y ?
Answers: 3
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 21:20, naenae6775
Christine wong has asked dave and mike to her move into a new apartment on sunday morning. she has asked them both, in case one of them does not show up. from past experience, christine knows that there is a 40% chance that dave will not show up and a 30% chance that mik a. what is the probability that both dave and mike will show up? (round your answer to 2 decimal places.) b. what is the probability that at least one of them will show up? c. what is the probability that neither dave nor mike will show up? (round your answer to 2 decimal places.)e will not show up. dave and mike do not know each other and their decisions can be assumed to be independent.
Answers: 2
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 22:20, azolber
In a young single person's monthly budget, $150 is spent on food, $175 is spent on housing, and $175 is spend on other items. suppose you drew a circle graph to represent this information, what percent of the graph represents housing?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
In a survey, 500 adults in a certain country were asked how many hours they worked in the previous w...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 13.10.2020 18:01
Konu
History, 13.10.2020 18:01
Konu
Computers and Technology, 13.10.2020 18:01