Premise 1: The defendant has no alibi for the night of the theft.
Premise 2: The stolen goods were found in the defendant's possession.
Premise 3: Two witnesses have identified the defendant as the thief.
Conclusion: The defendant is guilty of theft.
Decide whether the above argument is inductive or deductive.
tive.
Select an answer
If the above argument is inductive, decide if it is strong or weak. Select not applicable if the
argument is deductive.
Select an answer

step-by-step explanation:

here's what happens:

1) the graph of f   = x^2 is shifted 2 units to the right.

2) the resulting graph is reflected in the x-axis, so that the parabola now opens down.

3) this final result is transformed up by 5 units.

answer

false

explanation

these practices describe the manner the land use outcome is attained. land management methods implemented by corporations are a mandatory because they are a driver for better land use results economically, socially and environmentally. corporations are required to understand the connection between land use , and land management practices to support sustainable land use policies

if i put something wrong your not gonna like it so rather not say nothing.