In the August 12, 2007, issue of Parade magazine (which comes with the Sunday newspaper for millions of Americans), readers were asked to go online and vote on this question: Should the drinking age be lowered? The results were published in the October 7 issue; more than 14,000 readers voted, and 48% said “yes”. Use these sample data to determine a 99% confidence interval for the population proportion who favor lowering the drinking age. Report the margin-of-error for this confidence interval. Explain why this interval is so narrow. Without conducting a test of significance, what can you say about the p-value if you were to test whether the population proportion differs from one-half. Explain. Does Parade’s sampling method give you any reason to doubt that the confidence interval in question 1 is valid? I don’t understand how to do these questions.

i would have to say it is c.

so the possibilities of the measurement of the side of the triangle are either it is longest side or not the longest side

when it is the longest side

s < 25 + 35s < 60

if it is not the longest side

35 < 25 + s10 < sso 10 < s < 60so the perimeter70 < p < 130

no oblique asymptote

step-by-step explanation:

to find the oblique asymptote of f(x)

here numerator has degree 1 and denomintor degree 2

degree of numerator < degree of denominator

hence there is no oblique asymptote

when the degree of the denominator > that of the numerator, we saw that the value in the denominator got so much bigger, so quickly,   giving us a horizontal asymptote of the x-axis. or we can write

f(x) = a polynomial of x + a proper fraction.

in this case only we have oblique asymptotes but not when numerator has less degree.

i believe so, according to my "strange" way of figuring out weird math problems like this.