Which is true of the infinite solution of the inequality ×<0

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

What are the solution(s) to the quadratic equation x2 – 25 = 0? o x = 5 and x = -5ox=25 and x = -25o x = 125 and x = -125o no real solution

Abicycle training wheel has a radius of 3 inches. the bicycle wheel has a radius of 10 inches. approximately how much smaller, in square inches and rounded to the nearest hundredth, is the area of the training wheel than the area of the regular wheel? *