In a study of the nicotine patch, 21% of those who used the patch for 2 months reported no smoking incidents in the following year. The 95% confidence interval is (17.4%, 24.8%). Which of the following is an appropriate interpretation of the 95% confidence interval? Group of answer choices There is a 95% probability that the proportion of all nicotine patch users who would report no smoking incidents in the following year is between 17.4% and 24.8%. We can be 95% confident that the proportion of all nicotine patch users who would report no smoking incidents in the following year is between 17.4% and 24.8%. We can be 95% confident that the proportion of the sample who would report no smoking incidents in the following year is between 17.4% and 24.8%. 95% of samples will have between 17.4% and 24.8% who would report no smoking incidents in the following year.

understand that i don't know the answers

will someone answer his question

she gotta workk that a 2

step-by-step explanation:

answer:

it is general formula that is used to write value to its excet position

a11 a12 a13

a21 a22 a23

it is the example of order 2 by 3 matrix in this

a11 means value occur in 1 st row 1st column

a12 means value occurs in 1st row 2nd column

a13 means value occur in 1st row and 3rd column

a21 means value occurs in 2nd row and 1st column

a22 means value occurs in 2nd row and in 2nd column

a23 means value occurs in 2nd row and in 3rd column

1 number

if we use a graphing calculator, there is only one such number that satisfies the conclusion of the mean value theorem, that is, a number such that

where the right-hand side is the average rate of change of f on the interval [0.5,0.75], which is the slope of the secant line.

in the attached graph, the black line is the secant line which has its slope as the average rate of change of f on [0.5,0.75], while the orange line is the only tangent line to the graph of f in the interval that satisfies the mvt conclusion.