Of 560 samples of seafood purchased from various kinds of food stores in different regions of a country and genetically compared to standard gene fragments that can identify the species, 56% were mislabeled. a) Construct a 90% confidence interval for the proportion of all seafood sold in the country that is mislabeled or misidentified. b) Explain what your confidence interval says about seafood sold in the country. c) A government spokesperson claimed that the sample size was too small, relative to the billions of pieces of seafood sold each year, to generalize. Is this criticism valid?

a) (0.5256,0.5944)  

c) Criticism is invalid

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given the following in the question:

Sample size, n = 560

Proportion of mislabeled = 56%

a) 90% Confidence interval:

Putting the values, we get:

b) Interpretation of confidence interval:

We are 90% confident that the true proportion of all seafood in the country that is mislabeled or misidentified is between 0.5256 and 0.5944 that is 52.56% and 59.44%.

c) Validity of criticism

Conditions for validity:

Verification:

Both the conditions are satisfied. This, the criticism is invalid.

step-by-step explanation:

where is the question is there is a formula or is there not one