Mathematics, 24.03.2020 21:39 oomale

2/22
Which of the following is an acceptable explanation why transformed figures are
congruent to the original figures.
It depends on
whether you
translated, rotated,
or reflected.
The figures are
actually NOT
congruent.
The figures look the
some
Side lengths and
angles measures
stay the same when
transformed.
X
US
. 10:40

Answers: 3

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: Mathematics

Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:30, gracynamos

Express the following as a function of a single angle. cos(60) cos(-20) - sin(60) sin(-20)

Answers: 1

continue

Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:00, garciagang0630

[15 points, algebra 2]simplify the complex fraction and find the restrictions.

Answers: 1

continue

Mathematics, 21.06.2019 21:00, Woodlandgirl14

Can some one explain how to slove specifically, what is the value of x? 0.9(x+1.4)-2.3+0.1x=1.6 enter the answer as a decimal in the box. x= ?

Answers: 2

continue

Mathematics, 21.06.2019 21:50, amakayla57

What is the next step in the given proof? choose the most logical approach. a. statement: m 1 + m 2 + 2(m 3) = 180° reason: angle addition b. statement: m 1 + m 3 = m 2 + m 3 reason: transitive property of equality c. statement: m 1 = m 2 reason: subtraction property of equality d. statement: m 1 + m 2 = m 2 + m 3 reason: substitution property of equality e. statement: 2(m 1) = m 2 + m 3 reason: substitution property of equality

Answers: 3

continue

You know the right answer?

2/22
Which of the following is an acceptable explanation why transformed figures are
con...