Mathematics, 21.03.2020 10:04 Jackie2088
A magazine advertisement claims that wearing a magnetized bracelet will reduce arthritis pain in those who suffer from arthritis. A medical researcher tests this claim with 233 arthritis sufferers randomly assigned to wear either a magnetized bracelet or a placebo bracelet. The researcher records the proportion of each group who report relief from arthritis pain after 6 weeks. After analyzing the data, he fails to reject the null hypothesis. What are valid interpretations of his findings? Which of the following are valid interpretations of his findings? There may be more than one correct answer. Select all answers that apply A. The magnetized bracelets had exactly the same effect as the placebo at reducing arthritis pain. B. The magnetized bracelets are not effective at reducing arthritis pain C. There were no statistically significant differences between the magnetized bracelets and the placebos in reducing arthritis pain. D. There's insufficient evidence that the magnetized bracelets are effective at reducing arthritis pain.
Answers: 3
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 20:30, extasisjorge
Ming says that 0.24 > 1/4 because 0.24= 2/4. which best explains mings error
Answers: 1
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 21:50, roxanneee2145
5. which description does not guarantee that a quadrilateral is a squar ajo is a parallelogram with perpendicular diagonals 0% has all sides congruent and all angles congruent o has all right angles and has all sides congruent 10% is both a rectangle and a rhombus 30%
Answers: 2
A magazine advertisement claims that wearing a magnetized bracelet will reduce arthritis pain in tho...
Mathematics, 20.09.2020 14:01
Arts, 20.09.2020 14:01
Chemistry, 20.09.2020 14:01
Engineering, 20.09.2020 14:01