Melinda derives the quadric formula from the following equation, and her first four steps are shown below.

The equation:

where a ≠ 0

Melinda's steps :

Step 1 :

Step 2 :

Step 3 :

Step 4 :

Are Melinda's fisrt four steps correct?
*● if her steps are correct, explain how you know.
*●if her steps are incorrect, name the mistake(s) she made and explain how you know

< xcy ≅ < xby

step-by-step explanation:

in δcax and δbax,

so, δcax ≅ δbax (side-angle-side or sas)

since δcax ≅ δbax, we can conclude < acx ≅ < abx

in δacy and δaby,

so, δacy ≅ δaby (side-angle-side or sas)

since δacy ≅ δaby, we can conclude < acy ≅ < aby

now,

< acy ≅ < aby

=> < acx + < xcy ≅ < abx + < xby

=> < acx + < xcy ≅ < acx + < xby   (since < acx ≅ < abx already proved above)

subtracting < acx from both sides, we get

< acx + < xcy -< acx ≅ < acx + < xby -< acx

cancelling out < acx and -< acx from both sides, we get

< xcy ≅ < xby (proved)

2x + 8

step-by-step explanation:

all you have to do is multiply them both to see how many out comes you can put:

3 x 2 = 6

you can make 6 diferent combinations of crusts and toppings.

~batmans wife dun dun