What is the change that occurs to the parent function f(x)=x^2 given the function f(x)=2(x+2)^2+1

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Which of the expressions (on the photo document i inserted) together represent all solutions to the following equation? 8cos(12x)+4=-4 *the answer should be in degrees.* > i would like for someone to explain the process to find the solutions for this.

If you apply the changes below to the linear parent function f(x)=x what is the equation of the new function vertically stretched by a factor of 3 flip over the x axis